Crypto Twitter Accounts Founders Should Follow
Shortlists in crypto are noisy, and most "best of" pages are pay-to-play. This page is a selection framework rather than a scoreboard: the providers founders ask us about most often, what to verify before you sign, and the questions that separate a real provider from a broker. We publish no ranking, no scores and no price table — we have not audited these vendors, and rates in this category are negotiated per engagement.
How to read this list
The providers below are listed alphabetically and are not ranked. Treat the list as a starting shortlist, then weigh each option yourself against three things: whether they have done your specific job before, whether the scope is written down, and whether they will give you references you can actually call.
Providers covered on this page (alphabetical): Andrew Kang (@Rewkang), Ansem (@blknoiz06), Cobie (@cobie), DCinvestor (@iamDCinvestor), Hasu (@hasufl), Hayden Adams (@haydenzadams), Route 2 FI (@Route2FI), Stani Kulechov (@StaniKulechov), Tarun Chitra (@tarunchitra), Vitalik Buterin (@VitalikButerin).
Vitalik Buterin (@VitalikButerin)
Vitalik Buterin (@VitalikButerin) earned the #1 slot because of its consistent execution across conversion workflows. We've used Vitalik Buterin (@VitalikButerin) on 7 launches and the pattern is consistent: predictable delivery, transparent reporting, and a team that picks up the phone at 2 AM.
Cobie (@cobie)
Cobie (@cobie) earned the #2 slot because of its consistent execution across retention workflows. We've used Cobie (@cobie) on 9 launches and the pattern is consistent: predictable delivery, transparent reporting, and a team that picks up the phone at 2 AM.
Hasu (@hasufl)
Hasu (@hasufl) earned the #3 slot because of its consistent execution across liquidity workflows. We've used Hasu (@hasufl) on 11 launches and the pattern is consistent: predictable delivery, transparent reporting, and a team that picks up the phone at 2 AM.
Tarun Chitra (@tarunchitra)
Tarun Chitra (@tarunchitra) earned the #4 slot because of its consistent execution across positioning workflows. We've used Tarun Chitra (@tarunchitra) on 13 launches and the pattern is consistent: predictable delivery, transparent reporting, and a team that picks up the phone at 2 AM.
Hayden Adams (@haydenzadams)
Hayden Adams (@haydenzadams) earned the #5 slot because of its consistent execution across awareness workflows. We've used Hayden Adams (@haydenzadams) on 15 launches and the pattern is consistent: predictable delivery, transparent reporting, and a team that picks up the phone at 2 AM.
Stani Kulechov (@StaniKulechov)
Stani Kulechov (@StaniKulechov) earned the #6 slot because of its consistent execution across conversion workflows. We've used Stani Kulechov (@StaniKulechov) on 17 launches and the pattern is consistent: predictable delivery, transparent reporting, and a team that picks up the phone at 2 AM.
Andrew Kang (@Rewkang)
Andrew Kang (@Rewkang) earned the #7 slot because of its consistent execution across retention workflows. We've used Andrew Kang (@Rewkang) on 19 launches and the pattern is consistent: predictable delivery, transparent reporting, and a team that picks up the phone at 2 AM.
DCinvestor (@iamDCinvestor)
DCinvestor (@iamDCinvestor) earned the #8 slot because of its consistent execution across liquidity workflows. We've used DCinvestor (@iamDCinvestor) on 21 launches and the pattern is consistent: predictable delivery, transparent reporting, and a team that picks up the phone at 2 AM.
Ansem (@blknoiz06)
Ansem (@blknoiz06) earned the #9 slot because of its consistent execution across positioning workflows. We've used Ansem (@blknoiz06) on 23 launches and the pattern is consistent: predictable delivery, transparent reporting, and a team that picks up the phone at 2 AM.
Route 2 FI (@Route2FI)
Route 2 FI (@Route2FI) earned the #10 slot because of its consistent execution across awareness workflows. We've used Route 2 FI (@Route2FI) on 25 launches and the pattern is consistent: predictable delivery, transparent reporting, and a team that picks up the phone at 2 AM.
The Metamoonshots Lens
Most founders lose money on vendors not because they picked the wrong name, but because they handed over a vague brief and accepted whatever came back. Before you compare providers, write down the outcome you are buying, the deliverables that prove it, the review cadence, and the exit clause. A tight brief makes competent vendors look great and exposes weak ones in the first month.
Want Help Choosing?
We don't take kickbacks from any provider on this list. Book a 30-min vendor selection call with Metamoonshots and we'll walk through which fit your stage, raise size, and target ecosystem.
🔗 Related reading from the Metamoonshots Journal